This is today's featured match — its full report is free. Every board pick gets a page like this; members see all of them.

Mirra Andreeva vs Eva Lys

WTA · US Open Women Singles · Hard2026-09-03 15:00 UTC

Model-favored side: Mirra Andreeva · board of 2026-09-03

The math, in the open

Our model P (Mirra Andreeva)
85.6%
Pinnacle fair P (vig removed, two-sided)
Pinnacle raw implied P (Mirra Andreeva)
Best price implied P (1 ÷ odds)
Edge (model P − best implied P)
Books priced
0

Vig removal: Pinnacle's two prices imply more than 100% combined; normalizing them out gives the fair line. This row is outside the validated filter (5–12% disagreement, odds 2.0–3.0, ATP) — shown for transparency, not flagged.

What the model is weighing

No factor breakdown is published for this pick. We publish one only when a read-only recompute reproduces the stored probability; when it can't — or the data hasn't been generated yet — we omit the section rather than approximate.

Head-to-head & recent form

No prior meetings in our results database.

Mirra Andreeva: our results table ends 2024-10-14 — too stale to present as current form, so we omit it rather than show it.

Eva Lys: our results table ends 2024-10-14 — too stale to present as current form, so we omit it rather than show it.

Hard Elo: Mirra Andreeva 1752 (n=50) vs Eva Lys 1582 (n=36)

Context is shown for orientation. What the model actually used is the factor list above plus the schedule/context adjustment; a 2–1 head-to-head is an anecdote, not a signal.

The market picture — Mirra Andreeva price by book

No per-book snapshot is stored for this match.

Pinnacle fair P (vig removed): . Implied P here is raw 1 ÷ odds per book. Only one snapshot per book is stored so far — movement appears after the evening capture.

Analyst read

Written analysis for this match hasn't been published yet.

Sizing, as education: if you act on filter matches at all, professionals size them flat (a fixed ~1% of bankroll) or by fractional Kelly (we model 0.15× Kelly with an uncertainty discount). Never more because a number looks big — a bigger gap above 12% usually means a stale line, not a better bet.

We don't beat Pinnacle — nobody reliably does. We find the books that disagree with it, and we grade every pick against the close, publicly — the receipts, including what we got wrong. Not betting or financial advice. 21+ where legal. About Baseline.

← Back to the Edge Board